Frontier AIyou can prove.
A reliability layer for your AI applications. Every output verified, every tool call mediated, every block auditable.
Your skills file says
what should happen.
Nothing makes it happen.
Frontier vendors aren't selling you intelligence.
They're selling you self-grading.
One endpoint.
Every output verified.
Taiso is the reliability layer that wraps your model calls in independent verification — audited, schema-correct, source-grounded, every time. Behind a single OpenAI-compatible URL, so the migration is a one-line config change.
You never have to defend an unverified output again.
Four primitives.
One reliability story.
Taiso isn't a framework — it's an opinionated substrate. Four primitives compose, each addressing one concrete failure mode of today's agent stacks.
array lengths alone. The LLM's self-reported answer loses on disagreement.# audit_service.classify_field() if not support and not dispute: return "not_found" if support and not dispute: return "supported" if dispute and not support: return "disputed" return "unclear" # both? human review.
security and alignment — gate the action against your constraint store. Indirect injection has to fool all three.# intent_service.evaluate() intents = extractor.extract(turn) for i in intents: sec = security.check(i) align = alignment.check(i, north_star) if combine(sec, align) == EXECUTE: executor.run(i) # only path to a tool
audit: true — the audit runs between blocks and gates downstream execution on the risk score. State checkpointed after every node.# your SOP — patent generator blocks: - id: claims type: llm audit: true # gate downstream - id: file depends_on: [claims] when: "claims.audit.risk != 'high'"
# audit envelope, per event {"ts": "2026-05-09T10:42:23Z", "block": "claims", "field": "priority_date", "verdict": "disputed", "cite": {"src": "fil-87a", "start": 4112, "end": 4180}}
A single request.
Two different futures.
Same input. Same model. Same source documents. Below: what a typical structured-output call returns today versus what Taiso returns. The difference isn't "more JSON." It's whether you can prove the answer to a regulator, a customer, or a build that ships at 9am tomorrow.
// response.message.content { "invention_title": "Reliable Agent System", "inventors": ["M. Chatterjee"], "priority_date": "2024-10-14", "claims_count": 12 }
{
"invention_title": {
"value": "Reliable Agent System",
"classification": "supported",
"confidence": 0.94,
"citations": [{
"source_id": "fil-87a",
"char_start": 412, "char_end": 449 }]
},
"priority_date": {
"value": "2024-10-14",
"classification": "disputed",
"confidence": 0.18,
"disputing_evidence": [{
"quote": "filed 2024-11-08",
"char_start": 4112, "char_end": 4180 }],
"discrepancy": "extracted Oct, source says Nov"
},
"_summary": { "risk": "medium", "problem_ratio": 0.25 }
}Built like infrastructure,
not like a wrapper.
Three loops, one shared substrate. The extractor cannot run tools. The evaluators cannot run tools. Only the executor can — and only on intents that passed both axes. Every event is durable. Every event is replayable.
Two guarantees.
One layer.
Taiso Voice.
The platform, in production.
The first domain agent built on Taiso — same verification, same intent mediation, same audit trail, tuned to a single job.
More domain agents on the same substrate — get on the list →
Stop hoping.
Start proving.
If your agent is going to write code, file documents, move money, or touch patient data — the question isn't whether it works in a demo. It's whether you can defend what it did on a Tuesday morning.